"Steve Irving" <sdirv@nospamqwest.net> wrote in message
news:48ae15b6$0$33218$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
> you're either on the 3rd different computer today, or you changed your
> address AGAIN

today was a good day. im replicating domain controllers and was on 3
different computers before breakfast. if you REALLY want to block me, block
by IP as i only have 6 IPs and it would be quicker for you than by
non-existant email addresses made up on the spot when i set up the news
reader on each. course, if you REALLY didnt want to engage me you would
just not respond.

--
Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911talk.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://P7talk.com
http://PPStalk.com

Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "Steve Irving" <sdirv@nospamqwest.net> wrote in message
> news:48ae15b6$0$33218$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>> you're either on the 3rd different computer today, or you changed
>> your address AGAIN
>
> today was a good day. im replicating domain controllers and was on 3
> different computers before breakfast. if you REALLY want to block
> me, block by IP as i only have 6 IPs and it would be quicker for you
> than by non-existant email addresses made up on the spot when i set
> up the news reader on each. course, if you REALLY didnt want to
> engage me you would just not respond.

<munch , munch>
--
Snag
'90 Ultra "Strider"
'39 WLDD "Popcycle"
Buncha cars and a truck

Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "Steve Irving" <sdirv@nospamqwest.net> wrote in message
> news:48ae15b6$0$33218$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>> you're either on the 3rd different computer today, or you changed your
>> address AGAIN
>
> today was a good day. im replicating domain controllers and was on 3
> different computers before breakfast. if you REALLY want to block me, block
> by IP as i only have 6 IPs and it would be quicker for you than by
> non-existant email addresses made up on the spot when i set up the news
> reader on each.

<rolls eyes>

> course, if you REALLY didnt want to engage me you would
> just not respond.
>

You call this "engagement"?????

<sigh>

--
Steve Irving - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.users.qwest.net/~niteh/bike

"A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight and
understanding." Marshall McLuhan

Terry Coombs wrote:
> Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>> "Steve Irving" <sdirv@nospamqwest.net> wrote in message
>> news:48ae15b6$0$33218$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>>> you're either on the 3rd different computer today, or you changed
>>> your address AGAIN
>> today was a good day. im replicating domain controllers and was on 3
>> different computers before breakfast. if you REALLY want to block
>> me, block by IP as i only have 6 IPs and it would be quicker for you
>> than by non-existant email addresses made up on the spot when i set
>> up the news reader on each. course, if you REALLY didnt want to
>> engage me you would just not respond.
>
> <munch , munch>

Gets more interesting when one guy's a dumbass on purpose.......

--
Steve Irving - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.users.qwest.net/~niteh/bike

"A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight and
understanding." Marshall McLuhan

"Steve Irving" <sdirv@nospamqwest.net> wrote in message
news:48ae1d33$0$48226$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
> <rolls eyes>

uh-huh....you bitch and whine but you just cant help yourself. hypocrite.

--
Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911talk.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://P7talk.com
http://PPStalk.com

On 2008-08-21 18:20:42 -0700, "Nathan Collier" <fake@email.com> said:

> <whack>

Fuck off twat

> --
Ryder Rick
< >

On 2008-08-21 18:35:14 -0700, "Nathan W. Collier" <not@mymail.com> said:

Into the roto-plooker with the twat

--
Ryder Rick
< >

Terry Coombs wrote:
>
> Nathan W. Collier wrote:

======================= bigfuckingshipidifuckingdoda =================
>
> <munch , munch>

Needs more melted 'real' butter. <um... smack>

[30 days ina hole] <g>

--
(^oo^) AH#120 SENS NEWT#11 BS#188 MISFIT DOF#YES
(_0_) RMH FAQs - http://rmhfaq.com
BEAR Reply-To: gtodd at eye_ex dot netcom dot com

Steve Irving <sdirv@nospamqwest.net> wrote:

>
>Gets more interesting when one guy's a dumbass on purpose.......

Which one is doing it on purpose?


--
George

"Nathan W. Collier" <my@mail.com> wrote in message
news:V72dnWgFS7N6QzHVnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@bresnan.com. ..
> "nunya" <nunya@nunya.net> wrote in message
> news:1OUqk.12928$XT1.581@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>> yeah, i got in one of this guys threads in another of my newsgroups and
>> it it has become regrettable.
>
> dude....dont blame ME for how everyone reacted to YOUR irresponsible
> statements. YOU stated that the police officer was lucky you didnt shoot
> him, etc. that was YOUR doing. here is your post
> http://tinyurl.com/6ok39o you own your own dumb statements.
>
>
>> i think he starts em, stirs em, then wanders off leaving a mess in his
>> wake.
>
> i think you made an ass of yourself and you want to blame someone else.
> --
> Nathan In Montana


everyone have a drink on my tab while i speak my last peace with nathan...
shirley!

all i did in the other group was make a statement that anyone (cop or not)
who walks onto *my* property and reaches out and grabs *my* loaded gun while
it is in *my* hand is lucky that it doesn't go bad. i never said a thing
about you in the other group although i have had a tad of fun with those
guys. their chains seem pretty easy to yank. i didn't blame you there or
*here* for *my* statements. you like the guys in the other group need to
work on at least high school reading comprehension skills.

but wandering into every newsgroup on the net and starting gun topics is
sure to incite quite a few flame wars. to not recognize that is either
ignorance or stupidity. its like starting political and religious threads
outside of thier groups. just a sure way to get a bunch of folks upset.
yes, i made a mistake falling in the trap this time as i do every few years,
i am a doof occasionally. so now i am putting you in my killfile along with
the mi6 guy and all the kiddy porn folks so don't bother to reply. i will
never see it. i bet you will like it in that folder with all your friends.
i will never see any post you make on any usenet group in the future and
thus the temptation to stick my foot in my mouth will be removed. although
i am somewhat dumb i do have a limited ability to learn from my mistakes.

now buy everyone a drink before you leave. or at least read the FAQ if you
are going to stay because you haven't introduced yourself or bought a single
round to my knowledge. http://rmhfaq.com/
michael

the "killfile is getting bigger every day, whilst i pull my foot out of my
mouth in another group" motorsickle rider...

Bear@anywhere.invalid wrote:

:Needs more melted 'real' butter. <um... smack>

I am, in fact, eating some homemade popcorn right now.

<homer>
MMMMmmmmmmmm... Butter...
</homer>

---
Typical White Asshole

"Nathan W. Collier" <not@mymail.com> wrote:

:"Steve Irving" <sdirv@nospamqwest.net> wrote in message
:news:48ae1d33$0$48226$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
:> <rolls eyes>
:
:uh-huh....you bitch and whine but you just cant help yourself. hypocrite.

The two larger keys that say "Shift" are there for a purpose.
Hope that helps.


---
Typical White Asshole

Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "Steve Irving" <sdirv@nospamqwest.net> wrote in message
> news:48adf815$0$87077$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>> Means he was saying goodbye........
>
> no, it means a lot more than that. what would freud have to say about the
> need for recognition for jumping over on the bandwagon? :-)
>
> and its cool. it doesnt hurt my feelings one bit. i would actually very
> much prefer that the assholes stay in other threads anyway. there are still
> PLENTY of good folks here (that dont require the constant affirmation to
> ease their own insecurities) who just come here to talk about harleys and
> other related topics without having to play the "im a pretend 1%ER so buy me
> a pretend drink so that i feel special" game.
>
And you're an expert on the dynamics of this group based on what?

Fins BS#221

"nunya" <nunya@nunya.net> wrote:

:but wandering into every newsgroup on the net and starting gun topics is
:sure to incite quite a few flame wars.

I love gun threads.

My newest piece is a new Ruger LCP .380. It's wicked fun.

http://www.gunblast.com/images/Ruger-LCP/DSC03239.jpg
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger-LCP.htm

And... My local range put steel targets at 200 and 300 yards so I
don't have to walk down and hang targets anymore. I just listen for
the ding!

Note: I'm not shooting steel targets at 300 yards with the LCP, but
..223 makes a satisfying ding and 30-06 is very effective.

---
Typical White Asshole

"DM" <fins@nospam.bs221.com> wrote in message
news:eY2dnYk-0qN1UDPVnZ2dnUVZ_tHinZ2d@giganews.com...
> And you're an expert on the dynamics of this group based on what?
>
> Fins BS#221

Being a douche pump.

--
Tony D AH# 129
Philly Hoodlum©#37

Tony D wrote:
> "DM" <fins@nospam.bs221.com> wrote in message
> news:eY2dnYk-0qN1UDPVnZ2dnUVZ_tHinZ2d@giganews.com...
>> And you're an expert on the dynamics of this group based on what?
>>
>> Fins BS#221
>
> Being a douche pump.
>
That implies proximity to pussy. How about enema bag?

Fins BS#221

SteveT wrote:

> My newest piece is a new Ruger LCP .380. It's wicked fun.
>
> http://www.gunblast.com/images/Ruger-LCP/DSC03239.jpg
> http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger-LCP.htm

What a cute little pistol! It's kind of like a pre-fluff-n-buffed
KelTec. Very smooth and dainty.

And it won't make your pants fall down like a .45.

I like that a lot. Good review, too. Does your experience bear out the
review?
--
spunky hussein
ThinkingAboutWhatLarrySaidAboutAScrewItInHisLeftNo strilAndPullTheTriggerPistol
tuna

"SteveT" <rmh3@no48panspam.com> wrote in message
news:b5jta4tkgituub3an21hdeemu48q5e2v13@4ax.com...
>> My newest piece is a new Ruger LCP .380. It's wicked fun.
>
> http://www.gunblast.com/images/Ruger-LCP/DSC03239.jpg
> http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger-LCP.htm
>
> ---
> Typical White Asshole

Nice pocket gun. Friend of mine has one of those. I've got the .32 Keltec
for something small.

t

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:32:19 -0400, SteveT <rmh3@no48panspam.com>
wrote:

>"nunya" <nunya@nunya.net> wrote:
>
>:but wandering into every newsgroup on the net and starting gun topics is
>:sure to incite quite a few flame wars.
>
>I love gun threads.
>
>My newest piece is a new Ruger LCP .380. It's wicked fun.
>
>http://www.gunblast.com/images/Ruger-LCP/DSC03239.jpg
>http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger-LCP.htm

I *almost* bought one of those th' other day. Th' gal behind th'
counter wanted damn near $400 for it, no holster, extra mag, nuttin'.
There was a gent inside who said he'd sell me his slightly used Kel
Tec .380 for $150... Sold! He threw in th' original box, paperwork,
plastic holster and a belt clip too. Th' gal said they're sellin'
those Ruger's as fast as they can restock.

>And... My local range put steel targets at 200 and 300 yards so I
>don't have to walk down and hang targets anymore. I just listen for
>the ding!

No spotting scope in yer range bag?

Snarl

Nathan W. Collier <no@way.com> wrote:
> hello,
> in another thread i was pleasantly surprised by how many folks accept
> responsibility for their own security by legally carrying firearms either
> concealed or open. in an effort to assist any and all new to carry (as well
> as making a few good recommendations to those seasoned in carry) i have
> prepared a carry guide that you may find beneficial.
>
> http://concealedcarryforum.com/forum...?TOPIC_ID=4121
<snip>

Although your guide looks interesting at first glance (I'll
read it more thoroughly later), keep in mind that Usenet is not
USA-centric.

Some of us can't legally carry. As such, spare us the
"accept[ing] responsibility for their own security" rhetoric, please.


Phil
--
AH#61 Wolf#14 BS#89 bus#1 CCB#1 SENS KOTC#4 philb@total.net
http://ah61.com EKIII rides with me. http://eddiekieger.com
WWJD? JWRTFM.
hackerkey://v4sw5CU$hw7ln4pr7ck4ma9u7LMw2m7l7Si982Ct4b8en6a3Xs 7r2p-5.38/-8.77g4

DM wrote:
> Tony D wrote:
>
>> "DM" <fins@nospam.bs221.com> wrote in message
>> news:eY2dnYk-0qN1UDPVnZ2dnUVZ_tHinZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>>> And you're an expert on the dynamics of this group based on what?

>> Being a douche pump.

> That implies proximity to pussy. How about enema bag?

I don't EVEN want to say what those "cleaning utensils" might mean to
imply, and/or why you know people that need them.

spunky hussein tuna <spunkyhusseintuna@earthlink.net> wrote:

:I like that a lot. Good review, too. Does your experience bear out the
:review?

It is small, light and surprisingly accurate. I find that after two
or three rounds, I have to regrip because of the two-finger hold. I
had one failure to feed in the first 200 rounds. It may have been a
limp wrist or the steel case ammo. I'm switching to Winchester brass
for the next 200 to see what happens.

I also have a Keltec PF9. It's the same basic gun only bigger. It is
harder to control and takes up a lot of space in my pocket. It
really needs a coat pocket.

The Ruger is a true pocket pistol. You can actually put it in your
pocket and operate normally without bother. With the right holster,
it would appear to be a wallet. It's that small.

I had a .32ACP Beretta Tomcat and didn't like it. It was too easy to
limp wrist and wasn't very accurate. The .380 seems to be a good
compromise between size and effectiveness.

---
Typical White Asshole

snarl@trippin.com wrote:

:I *almost* bought one of those th' other day. Th' gal behind th'
:counter wanted damn near $400 for it, no holster, extra mag, nuttin'.
:There was a gent inside who said he'd sell me his slightly used Kel
:Tec .380 for $150... Sold! He threw in th' original box, paperwork,
lastic holster and a belt clip too. Th' gal said they're sellin'
:those Ruger's as fast as they can restock.
:
I paid $290. I'm not sure the KelTec isn't the exact same gun. It's
damned close from all appearances. I wonder if Ruger makes them
both. The specs lead me to believe they do.

:No spotting scope in yer range bag?

I've got a crappy one, but I still would have to walk out to the 300
yard stand and put up targets. Too much work.

I do, however, walk out to the 200 yard targets and spray them with
white paint. I use iron sights at 200 and a crappy scope at 300
yards. I can't hit shit with the .223 at 300 yards without a scope.
I think the '03 Springfield 30-06 is a way better gun at 300 yards.
The ammo is fucking expensive.

---
Typical White Asshole

Phil Boutros <philb@total.net> wrote:

: Some of us can't legally carry. As such, spare us the
:"accept[ing] responsibility for their own security" rhetoric, please.

I guess it's the "subject" vs. "citizen" thing.

The whole concept of the police protecting me from anything seems
strange. Here in the states at least, the police write reports and
try to solve crimes *after* they happen. That pretty much precludes
them from providing much personal protection in an emergency.

Of course, there aren't a hell of a lot of muggers or home invaders
in Banff.

---
Typical White Asshole

Tony D wrote:
> "DM" <fins@nospam.bs221.com> wrote in message
> news:eY2dnYk-0qN1UDPVnZ2dnUVZ_tHinZ2d@giganews.com...
>> And you're an expert on the dynamics of this group based on what?
>>
>> Fins BS#221
>
> Being a douche pump.
>

So THAT's what Stone meant...........

--
Steve Irving - BS#237/SLOB#12
http://www.users.qwest.net/~niteh/bike

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:28:02 -0400, SteveT <rmh3@no48panspam.com>
wrote:

>snarl@trippin.com wrote:
>
>:I *almost* bought one of those th' other day. Th' gal behind th'
>:counter wanted damn near $400 for it, no holster, extra mag, nuttin'.
>:There was a gent inside who said he'd sell me his slightly used Kel
>:Tec .380 for $150... Sold! He threw in th' original box, paperwork,
>lastic holster and a belt clip too. Th' gal said they're sellin'
>:those Ruger's as fast as they can restock.
>:
>I paid $290. I'm not sure the KelTec isn't the exact same gun. It's
>damned close from all appearances. I wonder if Ruger makes them
>both. The specs lead me to believe they do.

Could be, I haven't investigated it, so can't add anything of value to
that aspect. What I do know is that they're both really easy to
carry. Mine fits in a watch pocket (in a closed barrel holster that
covers th' trigger). And it's surprisingly accurate. Plus being a
Dutchman th' $150 price tag makes it better'n yers ; P

>:No spotting scope in yer range bag?
>
>I've got a crappy one, but I still would have to walk out to the 300
>yard stand and put up targets. Too much work.

I've got kids for that part. That is when I go to th' range...
usually just shoot at home in th' back 40. Or off th' deck. Or from
th' Hog-Den. Or wherever th' fuck I want <g>.

>I do, however, walk out to the 200 yard targets and spray them with
>white paint. I use iron sights at 200 and a crappy scope at 300
>yards. I can't hit shit with the .223 at 300 yards without a scope.
>I think the '03 Springfield 30-06 is a way better gun at 300 yards.
>The ammo is fucking expensive.

Pick yer pony and take yer ride.

Snarl

SteveT wrote:
> spunky hussein tuna <spunkyhusseintuna@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> I like that a lot. Good review, too. Does your experience bear out
>> the review?
>
> It is small, light and surprisingly accurate. I find that after two
> or three rounds, I have to regrip because of the two-finger hold. I
> had one failure to feed in the first 200 rounds. It may have been a
> limp wrist or the steel case ammo. I'm switching to Winchester brass
> for the next 200 to see what happens.
>
> I also have a Keltec PF9. It's the same basic gun only bigger. It is
> harder to control and takes up a lot of space in my pocket. It
> really needs a coat pocket.
>
> The Ruger is a true pocket pistol. You can actually put it in your
> pocket and operate normally without bother. With the right holster,
> it would appear to be a wallet. It's that small.
>
> I had a .32ACP Beretta Tomcat and didn't like it. It was too easy to
> limp wrist and wasn't very accurate. The .380 seems to be a good
> compromise between size and effectiveness.
>
> ---
> Typical White Asshole

I still like my Davis Ind. .38 derringer . Two hole belly gun , but then
the majority of "situations" happen at arms length ... and it's very nearly
invisible in my hip pocket . Six spare rounds in every vehicle I generally
use - just in case two ain't enough . Kinda ruins a perp's day when he gets
a muzzle instead of a wallet ... or so I've heard . <g>
--
Snag
'90 Ultra "Strider"
'39 WLDD "Popcycle"
Buncha cars and a truck

"nunya" <nunya@nunya.net> wrote in message
news:aAzrk.15978$vX2.11650@bignews6.bellsouth.net. ..
> but wandering into every newsgroup on the net and starting gun topics is
> sure to incite quite a few flame wars.

there was no flaming about the thread on that particular newsgroup before
you were dog-piled. notice i didnt jump in with the pack to attack your
statements.


> its like starting political and religious threads outside of thier groups.

if you didnt notice, there are a LOT of folks in this newsgroup who also
carry. this is "supposed" to be some type of virtual bar where folks chat
about whatever is on their minds. some respect that because they practice
what they preach. others are simply hypocrites...bitter old men who hope to
elevate themselves by jumping on any newbie that happens through....on the
one hand saying "its whatever you make it" and on the other hand bitching
and whining about content and insignficant sig lines. its sorta sad.

--
Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911talk.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://P7talk.com
http://PPStalk.com

"SteveT" <rmh3@no48panspam.com> wrote in message
news:b5jta4tkgituub3an21hdeemu48q5e2v13@4ax.com...
> My newest piece is a new Ruger LCP .380. It's wicked fun.

the ruger LCP is getting pretty dang popular, with most stores having
difficulty keeping them on the shelves for a single day. if you would like
i have extensive .380 ballistics available. if this is your primary carry
weapon, please carry FMJ loads so that you will at least have adequate
penetration.

--
Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911talk.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://P7talk.com
http://PPStalk.com

"Terry Coombs" <snagone@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:X5Krk.15035$De7.5236@bignews7.bellsouth.net.. .
> Kinda ruins a perp's day when he gets a muzzle instead of a wallet ... or
> so I've heard . <g>

indeed. there is no sweeter justice.

--
Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911talk.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://P7talk.com
http://PPStalk.com