...and he may be a helpless imbecile, but the pitiful old
fella sure can run when he's challenged to back up his silly
lies and blatant ignorance. <vbg>
The Older Gentleman whimpered and whined:
> But Henry is little more than a lavatory cleaner,
Without blatant lies, juvenile personal "attacks", ignorance,
and stupidly, magic fire/Super Arab cartoon conspiracy kooks
have nothing to support their comically and physically impossible
fairy tale.
> so what would you expect? Reasoned knowledgeable debate?
So says the older clown as he timidly hides and cowers behind
his killfile.
Your behavior is no different form that of a four year old child
who timidly sticks his head out from behind his bedroom door to
shout "you have kooties" then quickly ducks back in to hide
under his bed. Seems like self respect just doesn't register with
some folks. <chuckle>
I'm ready and willing to openly discus the facts. You're hiding
and spewing childish drivel. You've confirmed what thinking people
already know - your physically impossible cartoon conspiracy theory
can't be defended with anything even remotely close to logic, reason,
hard evidence, science, physics, facts, or an honest discussion.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com...-collapse.html
Structural Engineers Question Collapse of the World Trade Center
One of the arguments that government apologists have used in trying to
prop up the official story of why the World Trade Centers came down on
9/11 is that no structural engineers have questioned the government's
version of events. However, that is now changing.
The following structural engineers have now publicly challenged the
government's account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11:
Hugo Bachmann and Jörg Schneider, both emeritus professors in structural
engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (translation here)
Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)
Joseph M. Phelps, MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member,
Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers
Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas
William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont
Technical College
When considered along with the other prominent scientists who question
9/11, it becomes impossible for any thinking person to accept at face
value the government's version of the destruction of the World Trade Center.
More engineers and experts who explain why the Bush regime's
magic fire theory is physically impossible.
http://ae911truth.org/
Another one:
http://www.vermontguardian.com/comme...inTowers.shtml
And quite a few more:
http://911proof.com/10.html
And still more:
http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/0...-of-wtc-7.html