| |  | | 
08-05-2008, 11:39 PM
| | | Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By The So-Called"Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee In a recent thread entitled "Formula For Motorcycle 'Legroom' And
Overall Fit," a poster who calls himself TOG (The Obnoxious Gasbag),
posted 56 responses while others, except for the OP, posted only 159
COMBINED. Therefore, The Obnoxious Gasbag accounted for 26% of the
total responses to the original poster;
HOWEVER, NOT ONCE DID HE RESPOND TO THE ORIGINAL SUBJECT "Formula For
Motorcycle 'Legroom' And Overall Fit."
All he did was mount his soapbox and spew forth post after post of
material wholly unrelated to the original post. Is this an example of
a newsgroup member with something to offer? Hardly, unless you count
his mountains of personal bullshit as something to offer.
His spewings are a classic example of someone who thinks they know
things and when something comes up that leaves them totally stumped,
instead of just remaining quiet in their ignorance, they begin to blow
smoke and stir the pot hoping to hide the fact that they're really a
dumb fuck on the subject. Thus is the story of The Obnoxious Gasbag,
aka TOG, aka The Older Gentleman.
And then we have his equally moronic butt-buddy S'mee, aka Keith The
Retarded, who "contributed" 41 more of the 215, again, none related to
the original post. Yet these two goofballs actually think they have
value on the rec.motorcycles newsgroup when they can't even answer a
question, as posed in the OP, related to a motorcycle?
So, the Obnoxious Gasbag and Keith The Retarded together posted almost
HALF of the total posts by newsgroup regulars yet didn't address the
OP ONE SINGLE TIME. Talk about useless group members with nothing of
value to offer. SHEESH...Pitiful, boys, get a clue.....
J.S. | 
08-05-2008, 11:45 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 4:39*pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
> In a recent thread entitled "Formula For Motorcycle 'Legroom' And
> Overall Fit," a poster who calls himself TOG (The Obnoxious Gasbag),
> posted 56 responses while others, except for the OP, posted only 159
> COMBINED. *Therefore, The Obnoxious Gasbag accounted for 26% of the
> total responses to the original poster;
>
> HOWEVER, NOT ONCE DID HE RESPOND TO THE ORIGINAL SUBJECT "Formula For
> Motorcycle 'Legroom' And Overall Fit."
>
> All he did was mount his soapbox and spew forth post after post of
> material wholly unrelated to the original post. *Is this an example of
> a newsgroup member with something to offer? *Hardly, unless you count
> his mountains of personal bullshit as something to offer.
>
> His spewings are a classic example of someone who thinks they know
> things and when something comes up that leaves them totally stumped,
> instead of just remaining quiet in their ignorance, they begin to blow
> smoke and stir the pot hoping to hide the fact that they're really a
> dumb fuck on the subject. *Thus is the story of The Obnoxious Gasbag,
> aka TOG, aka The Older Gentleman.
>
> And then we have his equally moronic butt-buddy S'mee, aka Keith The
> Retarded, who "contributed" 41 more of the 215, again, none related to
> the original post. *Yet these two goofballs actually think they have
> value on the rec.motorcycles newsgroup when they can't even answer a
> question, as posed in the OP, related to a motorcycle?
>
> So, the Obnoxious Gasbag and Keith The Retarded together posted almost
> HALF of the total posts by newsgroup regulars yet didn't address the
> OP ONE SINGLE TIME. *Talk about useless group members with nothing of
> value to offer. *SHEESH...Pitiful, boys, get a clue.....
Heh, heh. The melt-down clown continues.
No, they aren't getting to you one bit... | 
08-06-2008, 12:24 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 3:39�pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
> HOWEVER, NOT ONCE DID HE RESPOND TO THE ORIGINAL SUBJECT "Formula For
> Motorcycle 'Legroom' And Overall Fit."
Yabbot, he got to play his "gotcha" game with you, hour after hour.
It's all a game with him, he's not trying to help anybody most of the
time.
There are several Reeky subscribers who would rather match "wits" than
share information. | 
08-06-2008, 02:18 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By The So-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:39:22 -0700 (PDT), "J.S."
<jay-smith-1935@excite.com> wrote:
>In a recent thread entitled "Formula For Motorcycle 'Legroom' And
>Overall Fit," a poster who calls himself TOG (The Obnoxious Gasbag),
>posted 56 responses while others, except for the OP, posted only 159
>COMBINED. Therefore, The Obnoxious Gasbag accounted for 26% of the
>total responses to the original poster;
You have way too much time on your hands. Go get laid or something.
--
See Ya On The Road
2000 Yamaha Venture Millennium
2004 HD Road King
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,
but by the moments that take our breath away. | 
08-06-2008, 02:35 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 4:39*pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
Hmm, seems I over did it with this troll. Oh well entropy will
hopefull drag the little shit down. Bit of a shame really...she was
entertaining.
--
Keith | 
08-06-2008, 02:36 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 5:24*pm, "." <Rhiann...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 3:39 pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > HOWEVER, NOT ONCE DID HE RESPOND TO THE ORIGINAL SUBJECT "Formula For
> > Motorcycle 'Legroom' And Overall Fit."
>
> Yabbot, he got to play his "gotcha" game with you, hour after hour.
> It's all a game with him, he's not trying to help anybody most of the
> time.
>
> There are several Reeky subscribers who would rather match "wits" than
> share information.
Better raise both hands sparky...oh wait your busy holding that altar
boy face down aren't you father flannagan? | 
08-06-2008, 04:39 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 3:45*pm, "Road Glidin' Don" <d.lan...@gmail.com> wrote: Heh,
heh. *The melt-down clown continues. No, they aren't getting to you
one bit.
Yep, they're not getting to me one bit and nobody's melting down at
this end, just enjoy watching you and your little boys club try to
turn it around and dodge the bullets. And Road Glidin' Don (what a
goofyass handle) is just another one of the little immatures that
inhabit this little boys club. | 
08-06-2008, 04:41 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 4:24*pm, "." <Rhiann...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 3:39 pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > HOWEVER, NOT ONCE DID HE RESPOND TO THE ORIGINAL SUBJECT "Formula For
> > Motorcycle 'Legroom' And Overall Fit."
>
> Yabbot, he got to play his "gotcha" game with you, hour after hour.
> It's all a game with him, he's not trying to help anybody most of the
> time.
>
> There are several Reeky subscribers who would rather match "wits" than
> share information.
Trouble is, all his efforts were in vain since he never "got" me. I
played that old fool like a violin and he was just simply too full of
himself to realize it.
And the reason they like to "play games" instead of offering valuable
advice is because they have no valuable advice to offer and their
little games are a smokescreen to hide their blatant stupidity. | 
08-06-2008, 04:42 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 6:35*pm, "S'mee" <stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 4:39*pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm, seems I over did it with this troll. Oh well entropy will
> hopefull drag the little shit down. Bit of a shame really...she was
> entertaining.
> Keith
HAHAHAHAHA Dream on Little Keithy, you did nothing. Your efforts at
the game were laughable at best and of no consequence. Actually, you
provided no challenge at all. Better luck next time jerking and
bobbing on my hook. Sucker! LOLOLOL | 
08-06-2008, 04:44 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 6:36*pm, "S'mee" <stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 5:24*pm, "." <Rhiann...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 5, 3:39 pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > HOWEVER, NOT ONCE DID HE RESPOND TO THE ORIGINAL SUBJECT "Formula For
> > > Motorcycle 'Legroom' And Overall Fit."
>
> > Yabbot, he got to play his "gotcha" game with you, hour after hour.
> > It's all a game with him, he's not trying to help anybody most of the
> > time.
>
> > There are several Reeky subscribers who would rather match "wits" than
> > share information.
>
> Better raise both hands sparky...oh wait your busy holding that altar
> boy face down aren't you father flannagan?
Sounds like you know a lot about child molesting Keith. Had some
experience??? Is there something you'd like to share with your other
pervert buttrubbing buddies on Reeky. Maybe you sickos could swap
stories and photos? | 
08-06-2008, 07:20 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By The So-Called"Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee J.S. wrote:
> And Road Glidin' Don (what a goofyass handle)
I agree. Who would ever think of using a silly nick like that?
Regards, Electra Glidin' Sean
'99 FLHTCUI | 
08-06-2008, 05:19 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 9:42*pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
> On Aug 5, 6:35*pm, "S'mee" <stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 5, 4:39*pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, seems I over did it with this troll. Oh well entropy will
> > hopefull drag the little shit down. Bit of a shame really...she was
> > entertaining.
> > Keith
>
> HAHAHAHAHA *Dream on Little Keithy, you did nothing. *Your efforts at
> the game were laughable at best and of no consequence. *Actually, you
> provided no challenge at all. *Better luck next time jerking and
> bobbing on my hook. *Sucker! *LOLOLOL
Oh bother...she really has lost it. Who said I was jerking you around?
I learned never to jerk, better to pull steady or push steady. Get's
the job done.
--
Keith | 
08-06-2008, 06:18 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 12:20*am, Sean_Q_ <nos...@no.sapm> wrote:
> J.S. wrote:
> > And Road Glidin' Don (what a goofyass handle)
>
> I agree. Who would ever think of using a silly nick like that?
Don't make me come over there, Sean...
Actually, I might be over 'there' soon. You live in B.C. somewhere,
right? I'm doing a Sunshine Coast ride in a couple of weeks. | 
08-06-2008, 06:32 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By The So-Called"Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee Road Glidin' Don wrote:
> Actually, I might be over 'there' soon. You live in B.C. somewhere,
> right? I'm doing a Sunshine Coast ride in a couple of weeks.
Cool, mebbe we can get together. I live in the Vancouver area.
SQ
'99 FLHTCUI / '06 S40 / various projects, derelicts and round tuits | 
08-06-2008, 06:46 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 5, 3:39 pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
> So, the Obnoxious Gasbag and Keith The Retarded together posted almost
> HALF of the total posts by newsgroup regulars yet didn't address the
> OP ONE SINGLE TIME. Talk about useless group members with nothing of
> value to offer. SHEESH...Pitiful, boys, get a clue.....
Let me offer a suggestion. Form your own moderated newsgroup
and only allow people you approve of into it. It could include you,
Krusty and anyone else you cared to invite in.
The rest of reeky would just have to continue living with those
two you so eloquently denounced and all the others like them. | 
08-06-2008, 07:02 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 10:46*am, Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:
> The rest of reeky would just have to continue living with those
> two you so eloquently denounced and all the others like them.
Meaning "everybody". | 
08-06-2008, 07:13 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 11:02 am, Twibil <jose.now...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 10:46 am, Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > The rest of reeky would just have to continue living with those
> > two you so eloquently denounced and all the others like them.
>
> Meaning "everybody".
Shhh !!! | 
08-06-2008, 07:29 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By The So-Called"Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
> Let me offer a suggestion. Form your own moderated newsgroup
> and only allow people you approve of into it.
What a great idea. I want to set up my own group too. For Old School
bikes (and bikers). Harley, Indian, Excelsior, etc. Vintage Brit fans
are especially welcome (even if they don't own one). Dirt bikers are
welcome, but spamming Chinese clones gets you banned.
Even sportbikers can join, with the understanding that they will be
subject to good-natured insults (which can returned in a like-minded
spirit).
SQ | 
08-06-2008, 09:23 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 9:19*am, "S'mee" <stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote: I
learned never to jerk, better to pull steady or push steady. Get's the
job done.
> Keith
Well now Keithy finally spews forth the truth of how he gets his
jollies. (Probably thinking about one of those altar boys as he does
it). He doesn't "jerk" but likes to "pull steadily." Wonder if he
uses BOTH hands when he "does it" while looking at a photo of TOG
pinned to the wall above his toilet? LOLOL | 
08-06-2008, 09:25 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 10:46*am, Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:
> The rest of reeky would just have to continue living with those two you so eloquently denounced and all the others like them.
And my sympathies would go out to you and all the other poor souls who
would have to continue to associate with those dumb dickheads. | 
08-06-2008, 09:26 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 11:02*am, Twibil <jose.now...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 10:46*am, Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > The rest of reeky would just have to continue living with those
> > two you so eloquently denounced and all the others like them.
>
> Meaning "everybody".
Only the foolish, retarded, unwashed, uneducated and simply goofy.
IOW, EVERYBODY! | 
08-06-2008, 09:36 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 1:25 pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 10:46 am, Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > The rest of reeky would just have to continue living with those two you so eloquently denounced and all the others like them.
>
> And my sympathies would go out to you and all the other poor souls who
> would have to continue to associate with those dumb dickheads.
And your sympathies mean a lot. Really.
Best of luck in finding a group more worthy
of your presence. | 
08-06-2008, 09:50 PM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By The So-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee
"Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216128@aol.com> wrote in message
news:06f14074-a78b-424c-bddd-42007e11a3fc@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 6, 1:25 pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 6, 10:46 am, Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > The rest of reeky would just have to continue living with those two you
>> > so eloquently denounced and all the others like them.
>>
>> And my sympathies would go out to you and all the other poor souls who
>> would have to continue to associate with those dumb dickheads.
>
> And your sympathies mean a lot. Really.
>
> Best of luck in finding a group more worthy
> of your presence.
Yeah, we'll sure miss you.
(He IS going, right? What? NO? Damn....)
Bob M. | 
08-07-2008, 02:58 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By The So-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:18:37 -0700 (PDT), "Road Glidin' Don"
<d.langkd@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 6, 12:20*am, Sean_Q_ <nos...@no.sapm> wrote:
>> J.S. wrote:
>> > And Road Glidin' Don (what a goofyass handle)
>>
>> I agree. Who would ever think of using a silly nick like that?
>
>Don't make me come over there, Sean... 
>
>Actually, I might be over 'there' soon. You live in B.C. somewhere,
>right? I'm doing a Sunshine Coast ride in a couple of weeks.
I don't know what your plans are but take a look at the circle tour
offered by BC Ferries. I think it is Horsehoe Bay to Gibsons, Earls
Cove to Saltery Bay, Powell River to Comox and then either Nanaimo -
Horseshoe Bay, or Swartz Bay - Tsawwassen)
I was going to try that tour a couple of years back but work got in
the way.
--
See Ya On The Road
2000 Yamaha Venture Millennium
2004 HD Road King
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,
but by the moments that take our breath away. | 
08-07-2008, 04:07 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By The So-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:58:27 GMT, Calgary
<actual.rider_remove_the_obvious_@telus.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:18:37 -0700 (PDT), "Road Glidin' Don"
><d.langkd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Aug 6, 12:20*am, Sean_Q_ <nos...@no.sapm> wrote:
>>> J.S. wrote:
>>> > And Road Glidin' Don (what a goofyass handle)
>>>
>>> I agree. Who would ever think of using a silly nick like that?
>>
>>Don't make me come over there, Sean... 
>>
>>Actually, I might be over 'there' soon. You live in B.C. somewhere,
>>right? I'm doing a Sunshine Coast ride in a couple of weeks.
>
>I don't know what your plans are but take a look at the circle tour
>offered by BC Ferries. I think it is Horsehoe Bay to Gibsons, Earls
>Cove to Saltery Bay, Powell River to Comox and then either Nanaimo -
>Horseshoe Bay, or Swartz Bay - Tsawwassen)
>
>I was going to try that tour a couple of years back but work got in
>the way.
Thanks Don. I'll look into that. | 
08-07-2008, 04:39 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 2:36*pm, Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 1:25 pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 6, 10:46 am, Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > The rest of reeky would just have to continue living with those two you so eloquently denounced and all the others like them.
>
> > And my sympathies would go out to you and all the other poor souls who
> > would have to continue to associate with those dumb dickheads.
>
> And your sympathies mean a lot. Really.
>
> Best of luck in finding a group more worthy
> of your presence.
And don't let the proverbial door hit you in the ass on the way out.
There is that better? I took for granted that's what you meant and
just added it so the poor bastard child could understand with his
addled brain.
--
Keith | 
08-07-2008, 04:41 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 2:23*pm, "J.S." <jay-smith-1...@excite.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 9:19*am, "S'mee" <stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote: *I
> learned never to jerk, better to pull steady or push steady. Get's the
> job done.
>
> > Keith
>
> Well now Keithy finally spews forth the truth of how he gets his
> jollies. *(Probably thinking about one of those altar boys as he does
> it). *He doesn't "jerk" but likes to "pull steadily." *Wonder if he
> uses BOTH hands when he "does it" while looking at a photo of TOG
> pinned to the wall above his toilet? *LOLOL
Are STILL trying to insult or make witty comments at my expense? You
have a LONG way to go junior. Good luck but so far you aren't showing
enough intelligence to actually irritate me.
--
Keith | 
08-07-2008, 06:49 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 6, 8:41 pm, "S'mee" <stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote: Good
luck but so far you aren't showing enough intelligence to actually
irritate me.
> Keith
Actually, Keith (by the way, nice misdirection smokescreen effort),
the REAL reason my post didn't "irritate" you was that it was true and
that you enjoy doing it to yourself with both hands so I just brought
pleasant memories of yours to the surface. You're a homoerotic auto-
whacker and you're proud of it thus no "irritation" there unless, of
course, you do it too long without stopping to rest. But is the photo
of Toggy Boy on the wall REALLY necessary??? LOL
Your pal, J.S. | 
08-07-2008, 08:45 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By The So-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee S'mee <stevenkeith2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Are STILL trying to insult or make witty comments at my expense? You
> have a LONG way to go junior. Good luck but so far you aren't showing
> enough intelligence to actually irritate me.
He's getting a bit obsessive, isn't he? It's been a while since I've had
such a nutter on my case.
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Yamaha XT600E Honda CB400F & SH50
GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60
The bells, the bells..... | 
08-07-2008, 10:24 AM
| | | Re: Numerical Data To Prove The Worthlessnes of Posts By TheSo-Called "Older Gentleman" And His Butt-Buddy S'mee On Aug 7, 12:45*am, totallydeadmail...@yahoo.co.uk (The Older
Gentleman) wrote: He's getting a bit obsessive, isn't he? It's been a
while since I've had
such a nutter on my case.
HAHAHAHAHA Spew all you want you ignorant old fart with your little
pithy "English" droolings about "rants' and "obsessiveness" and you
other little dumbass comments; however, once again, gasbag, you miss
the point. I'm having so much fun screwing with the simple minds of
you ignorant bastards, especially you and your little lap doggy Keith,
that it's just too much fun to stop.
It's not "obsession" you brainless old fool, it's sheer F-U-N and fun
should never be curtailed just because some old dried up blowhard from
London thinks it should. LOLOLOL You fools are like the gift that
keeps on giving. With every post I make, you hop right in there just
as if I snapped my fingers and a little pet monkey responded.
Okay, now it's time to wait and see which pet monkey wants to dance
for J.S.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 02:55 AM. |