"Sean_Q_" <no.spam@no.spam> wrote in message news:h6b5qa$69i$1@aioe.org...
> ...with a fetish for viewing pix of dead deer and damaged bikes.
>
> The writer, Eric Rossiter (_Kansas City Motorcycle Examiner_) says
> "slow down", amongst other ruminant-avoidance advice.
>
> Well, great in theory, but do that too much or too often and don't
> you risk getting rear-ended by some impatient or distracted cager?
> Actually I find his writing style irritating, so read this only if
> you're in the mood for aggravation:
>
> http://www.examiner.com/x-3640-Kansa...e-strikes-deer
I don't find him that annoying. The suggestions were sound.
I think the "no swerve" recommendation really depends on the situation and
the skill of the rider. I know one guy who went highly evasive on an
imminent deer collision -- he ended up slightly unjuring his leg because he
clipped the deer with his leg but otherwise stayed upright. For him,
swerving worked out alright (a bruise is better than scrapping a bike and
maybe getting seriously injured). But it could have also turned out badly.
I almost struck a fawn the other day. I was really disappointed in my level
of skill.
The little beast went from left to right across the road. I stood on the
brakes and accidentally locked up the rear. I started at about 50 and was
probably down to 25 with the rear wheel skidding when the thing went across
my bow from left to right. I missed it by no more than 24 inches.
What disappointed me about my response is that I should probably have also
gone left rather than brake in a straight line. I think what screwed with
me mentally is that it was a moving object that I perceived as
unpredicatable. Something mentally told me to not to go left and count on
it continuing right.
It was a good day for me and the beast both.
Datesfat